Audience Profile
Trevor is a 38 year old man who is a father of a small child. He is self employed as a plumber and lives in a small house near the centre of Sheffield city. He is married and most of his money goes towards his family, but he allow himself a few luxuries like beer and a night out with his friends every now and then.
He listens to lots of rock and punk music, but isn't afraid to try new genres and bands. He likes to watch films but isn't able to watch many mature ones as he has to watch things appropriate for his children, except when they're out. On friday night after a hard day of work, he hits the pub with the lads to throw back a few pints and complain about everything. Every fortnight on a Saturday he has a 11 a side with the local team against Rotherham, which always ends in a healthy trip to the pub with both teams to celebrate.
Gender
I believe that my film is aimed towards a male audience, this is because of the content and scenes that take place within the film. This is because of how intense and gritty the action is in the film, which is appealing to a male audience.
Near the beginning of Dead Man's shoes there is a scene in which three characters are all sat in one room taking drugs and talking to one another, throughout this scene there is a strong scene of competition and male bravado, which is something that should be relatable to men and make the characters in the film seem more realistic to them.
Another scene in which the films seems to cater towards a male audience, is the scene before the confrontation on the farm: where the two brothers are sat back to back talking to each other and reminiscing. This is the scene where the bond between the two characters is the most prominent in the whole film. This scene would attract males as it is something only they would understand and the way in which the family looks after and appreciates one another which most people look for in family.
At one point during a flashback in the film, we see sonny forcing a female character to have sex with Anthony, We don't learn a lot about this character and they don't appear in the film apart from this scene. There is also one other female character in the film, who also has limited screen time. this could be seen as the female characters are only there to be seen as sex objects. This could alienate female audiences, with them feeling a sense of inequality between male and female characters.
Richard was in the army for many years before returning to the village. This would appeal to male audiences as being a soldier is seen as a very masculine occupation and thereby would make Richard into more of a classic "manly man" that the audience would find an appeal, like an action hero of sorts
Age
I predict that the age that my film is aimed for is around 38 years old, even though the age certificate is 18. I believe this because of how the narrative of the film unfolds and how the film is paced, which makes it seem like to much of a slow burn for a younger audience to enjoy.
The film has a strong focus on family and responsibility, something which would be more easier to understand and empathise with if you're starting to settled down, something more common at that age.
There is also frequent of drug use throughout the film. Whilst a younger audience might be attracted to this and see it as more funny or not as strong of a negative character aspect, an older audience will be able to recognise the threat that it poses and be able to view the characters accordingly.
The characters in the film are all aged above 30 (excluding Toby Kebbel as Anthony). this means that they are near enough the age that the film is aimed at, this makes it stand out compared to many films which only star young and beautiful people. This allows them to take the film and its themes more seriously as they can picture themselves in this film and not just a perfect and young version of themselves.
Another example of age in the film is nearer the end when we meet Richard's last target. He's a middle aged family man with two children. This character would be important to audiences as he would probably have a very similar age to those of the audiences, and has a very stereotypical lifestyle for someone of that age. This would mean that he would be the character that audiences could picture themselves as the most and more easily empathise with, this would make the scene between him and Richard even more effective and they understand why Richard is killing so many people, but will also feel sorry for the other character who has tried to redeem himself. This would create a sense of moral ambiguity with audiences not being able to decide how they want the confrontation to end.
Lifestyle
The National Readership surveyors are the company who decide the different groups within Britain and how they all fit into each other. for example the audience of my film could be described as both settled suburbans and hard pressed families as the content of the film and the verisimilitude make it more relatable to them. A lot of the characters in the film take drugs, so the audience would be expected to have a bit of knowledge about drug use. People who would have grown up in a more middle and working class environment are more likely to have had a closer view of drug use, be it in schools or just wherever they live. This would make it easier for the target audience to understand what's going on and remove the need for lots of exposition. This would make the film feel more streamlined and not disrupting the pace. It would also help them to remember that although it's these people that are being hunted down, they aren't good people and that Richard's revenge is more noble than it might seem at first.
All of the character in the film are middle to working class. This would make them the same as the target audience of the film. The characters would therefore be easier to empathise with as they would have most likely been similar to either the audience or someone that the audience knows. This would make the characters of the film feel more like real people and make their struggle seem all the more realistic.
All of the characters in the film wear costumes which essentially equate to normal clothes. This means that all of the costumes are very realistic and audiences would be able to notice how they're wearing things that can be so commonly found, this would make it easier to take characters seriously.
Dead man's shoes fits Denis Mcquaid's theory of uses and gratifications. In this theory it comes under the category for building personal relationships and building self-identity. This is because of how the film makes you question whether Richard was right or not and the ending leaves some questions for viewers. Depending on viewers think these questions should be answered and their opinions on the events that happen in the film and whether they were right or not, will help them to understand about themselves and how their sense of morality works.Other people might feel different about this and so by talking about the events of the film people might able to discover things about one another and want to want more films with a sense of ambiguity which would help them to develop their relationship. This ambiguity is presented in a format that that is more relatable to people with a grade of C1/C2/D and this makes all the questions that film asks feel more important and removes any aspect of pretentiousness that the certain other films with open ambiguity might have.
Spending Power
In Dead man's shoes all of the characters are dramatically grounded in reality. Sonny's crew are drug dealers but they don't have a massive drug empire and lots of money, they do this job because it provides them with the money they need to get by, they're still struggling to earn what they need. The whole of the crew have to share a single car which belongs to Sonny. This can relate to the more working class target audience as none of the characters in the film have more money than you would expect among the target audience.
The film was made on a cheaper budget so warp wouldn't need such a high box office for the film to be declared a success. This means that the film can be sold to audiences for cheaper, whether it's in cinemas or on dvd/bluray, this would make it more affordable to a more working class audience of C1/C2
There are several scenes in the film set inside character's houses, this reveals aspects of the characters and shows how have normal houses that you would expect to find for people like them and that the audience is likely to have something similar to, this makes the film feel a lot more realistic and helps the audience to believe that these characters are people and empathise with them more.
Paddy Consadine's character comes back from the Army in dead man's shoes, it doesn't state why he went away to fight, but seeing as how he has a brother with special needs and that he doesn't come from that rich of a family, we can guess that one of the reasons would be money, this would be easy for the target audience to be able to compare to as they would also be trying to find money to support themselves and their family, and might have also needed to take a job that would take them away from home, so that they could support their families.
Dennis Mcquaid's theory of surveillance states that audiences can watch a film for four different reasons:
1) Surveillance
Gaining information (e.g. socially or morally)
2) Escapism
Escape Daily lives and enter a fictional narrative
3) Building personal identity
Discovering yourself and how you feel about certain subjects. Being interested in certain genres. Looking at actors and figuring out how they affect me
4) Building personal relationships
When the media product provides a topic of conversation and allows you to communicate with others.
Dead man's shoes fits all four of these criteria. It fits the first one by showing how people with disabilities are still mistreated and taken advantage of and how this would also affect people around them. It juxtaposes the often glorified idea of drug dealing and the profits of it, by showing a group of drug dealers characters and conveying them as quite pathetic characters that haven't done anythign with their lives.
It also fits the criteria of Escapism, by the fact that it tells a fictional story that creates a narrative that would envelope readers and allow them a chance to forget about their own lives and engage with the film for the running time allowing to escape their responsibilities and problems for a short while.